This article will not explain what a binding is or how to use them. Instead, it gives you a clear picture of what the various types of binding are and why we require these bindings. How do we need to configure a binding? How do we need to set multiple bindings? Why we need to modify bindings? Yes, there are many more interesting concepts explained.
The following table shows the types of bindings and their uses
|BasicHttpBinding||Allows us to create and consume ASMX-style services within WCF.
No Security provided for the messages.
No Reilable Messaging, Responses will not come in order.
Suitable for clients who do not have .Net 3.0 installed.
|webHTTPBinding||Allows us to create and expose your services as HTTP requests.
Used for REST Based Services.
|wsHttpBinding||Exposes web services using ws-* specifications.
Security provided (Ws-Security) for messages by default.
Uses for WS-Transactions, WS-BusinessActivity.
|wsDualHttpBinding||This is like the preceding one, but it uses duplex contracts. This means the both client and server can both send and receive messages|
|wsFederationHttpBinding||Provides a mechanism for exposing a federated service.
The client uses a security token issued by a security token service to authenticate.
|netTCPBinding||Service to Service Communication in an intranet.
Features include transactions and security. For WCF to WCF service communication netTCPBinding is best.
|netPeerTCPBinding||Used when you require more security for Peer to Peer Communication as netTCPBinding.|
|netMsMqBinding||Binding for asynchronous communication using Microsoft Message Queue (MSMQ).
Best when you need to execute service operations in a queued manner.
Configuring Binding Declaratively and Programmatically
I must say the binding is the first and foremost configuration you need to do in WCF, actually it defines the parts of your service. Have a look at the following configuration:
A little vague, right? If you look at the preceding configuration, which element comes under which element, how do I remember this hierarchy? For anyone new to WCF, the hierarchy is a bit challenging, but I have one technic as college goer Bigard. For the college semesters, services have service rights, in the service you have the “e” as the last letter. E represents the endpoint that is nothing but an ABC, ABC represents an address, binding and contract.
Finally, wherever we define the host, addresses are the required field as in the following:
Now let’s see how we can define the same in programmatically.
As you see in the preceding snapshot, you must define the host first in which endpoint must be defined.
What is the base Address? Very simple, you can define the address in the base and refer to it down the line. This is how I used to map in my mind. At every endpoint we are about to define the address, but do you think it is easy to change to an address if you have more than 5 endpoints? Very tough, right? Yes, we need to search each and every endpoint in the config file and change it. But if we have a facility to put up in one common place and relatively map into each and every endpoint then that’s a really cool idea to know. This is called base addresses. If you have an entire library of endpoints, it’s really hard to manage without base addresses. We can have multiple base bind addresses for each service, but only one address for each protocol. WCF will automatically map the correct address based on the binding configuration of the endpoint. Please look at the following snapshot to get a better understanding.
The WCF 4.0 release actually simplifies the configurations by defining the default configurations for several aspects of WCF. WCF has a predefined protocol mapping, that maps the protocol schema to the WCF binding.
Still, if you are not satisfied with the default mapping, you can change the default settings by making the following changes in the configuration file:
Without defining the behavior explicitly, we have an option in WCF to write a default behavior. The following is the example of defining the explicit behavior, in other words we must provide a name for the behavior and refer to the same name in the endpoint configuration.
In the default behavior, there is no need to specify the behavior name, by default WCF takes the behavior that is configured. Please refer to the following snapshot of default behavior:
Do you like your service to be consumed by any type of client? The solution is to create multiple endpoints with varying sets of bindings, in other words your service logic will be the one, but the transport mechanism and the address will be different for each.
Binding is all about how the message will be transmitted, one service Implementation can have multiple bindings for many types of clients to consume it. Default behaviors and default bindings are the latest features in WCF 4.0